Van Pools Blog

Posts Tagged ‘Interviews and Experts’

Van-Pools.com Interview with Daniel Sperling, Author of “Two Billion Cars”

February 25th, 2009 1 Comment

dansperlingDaniel Sperling is a Professor of Engineering and Environmental Science & Policy at the University of California, Davis and the founding Director of the UC Davis Institute of Transportation Studies. Professor Sperling is a long time VPSI vanpooler and serves as an Automotive Member on the California Air Resources Board, chairs the Future of Mobility Council of the Davos World Economic Forum, and has authored many books and technical papers on transportation and energy. His latest book, which he co-authored with Deborah Gordon, is “Two Billion Cars: Driving Toward Sustainability”.

VP:  Congratulations on your new book, “Two Billion Cars: Driving Toward Sustainability”.  Do you think the book will serve as a wake up call to the United States and the World to alter its policies of encouraging unsustainable growth of single occupant auto use and increasing greenhouse gas emissions from tailpipes?

DS: I sense a growing recognition that change is needed. Support for climate change policies is increasing, California passed a new law to (try to) reduce vehicle travel and sprawl (SB375), and the Obama Administration seems strongly committed to more environmental vehicles. I am hopeful.

VP: How would you respond to auto industry claims that consumers don’t like smaller, fuel efficient cars and that is why they continued to build and sell SUVs even as fuel prices were rising to previously unheard of prices?

DS: The SUV phenomenon was a fad and partly artificial. Why? First, automakers have always promoted power and size, from the muscle cars and stylized fins of earlier generations to the huge SUVs of recent years. Smaller vehicles were sold as “economy” cars. In the US, they have rarely tried to build small vehicles that are sophisticated and high quality. If they build and promote small, high quality cars, I suspect they will be successful. Second, automakers were encouraged to sell SUVs and other light trucks by low fuel taxes, regulatory loopholes, and trade protection tariffs. Changing those rules and policies will make a big difference. Third, most vehicles are purchased by richer people, who are less sensitive to fuel costs, which explains in part the strong sales over time of larger and more expensive vehicles. Fourth, in fact, we are seeing more enthusiasm for smaller vehicles, from the Mini to the Smart and the subcompacts now being sold by most of the major automakers. We need to reverse the wrongheaded policies of the past, and adopt new policies that reward automakers for selling fuel-efficient, low-carbon vehicles, and reward customers for buying them.

VP:  How important are hybrids in addressing the challenges posed by your book?

DS:  They are important in their own right, for being far more fuel efficient. But they are also important as the first step toward electric-drive vehicles: battery electric, plug-in hybrid, and fuel cell electric vehicles. Eventually almost all vehicles will likely be powered by electric motors.

VP:  What are some of the most important points you’d like people to take away from “Two Billion Cars”?twobillioncarscoverart

DS:  We are creating a potential catastrophe by using so much oil and emitting so much greenhouse gases—and vehicles are a chief culprit. But we can transform vehicles, fuels, and mobility. The key is policy—but also the behavior of us as individuals. As consumers, we need to buy more environmentally sustainable vehicles, as voters we need to elect politicians committed to creating strong policies and incentives, and as shareholders we need to tell corporations to pay attention to the public interest. We need leadership at all levels.

VP:  What advice would you give American consumers who already own gas guzzling SUVs and cannot sell these cars to replace them with more fuel efficient vehicles like hybrids?

DS:  The resale value of SUVs is rising. When you feel financially secure, make the switch. Remember, the fuel efficient vehicles will end up saving most people considerable money in fuel savings over the life of the vehicle. Note also that some hybrids are quite inexpensive, including the new Honda Insight coming out this spring which is expected to sell for less than $20,000.

VP:  You’ve been vanpooling for nearly two decades. What motivated you to use our service and how, with your busy schedule, have you been able to vanpool for so many years?

DS:  It saves money and I can use the time productively (working on my next book or my next lecture, or occasionally sleeping). I confess that initially I was resistant, unhappy with the rigidity of the schedule. It seemed so un-American, taking away my freedom. I eventually realized that my life was so complicated, that providing a bit more structure was actually a good thing. And my family was happy to know exactly when I would be home for dinner.

VP:  Why isn’t vanpooling a bigger part of the mix of transportation “choices” you said we needed to create during your talk at the World Affairs Council on January 13th?

DS:  Most people don’t like the rigidity of the schedule, and some realistically can’t commit to a fixed schedule. I think the answer is “smart vanpools”, whereby one can call a van at any time (via cell phone or Internet) for immediate pickup. The information technologies exist to do this, and if there were enough vans running around, the cost would be modest. Maybe VPSI should think about this new business?!

VP:  During your presentation at the World Affairs Council you stated there needs to be more innovation in the transportation sector and specifically noted that the information technology revolution of the 1990s seemed to have largely overlooked public transportation. Why didn’t smart technology find a ready partner in public transportation?

DS:  What we need is a greater diversity of mobility services. Smart vanpooling (sometimes called smart jitneys), smart carpooling where people going to the same location can easily organize themselves, and smart carsharing so that households can retire one car and get easy access to a vehicle when they need it, are all good examples of what is possible. Alas, there are many barriers to change in the transport sector. Transit agencies have been starved for so long, they are incapable and reluctant to try something new. Taxi companies resist allowing more competition. And suburban sprawl makes public transportation more challenging. But I believe the IT revolution will eventually come to transportation and we’ll see a proliferation of new, inexpensive, convenient services. After all, wouldn’t most of us rather be chauffered?

VP:  How badly do you think the current economic slow down and the precipitous decline in available investment capital will curtail spending on alternative energy and sustainable transportation solutions?

DS:  The economic slowdown is having an effect, but with supportive policies and the inevitable rise in oil prices, we will see a resurgence in low-carbon and energy efficient technology and services.

VP:  What were some of the key mobility/transportation issues discussed when you were at the Davos World Economic Forum in January?

DS:  Electric vehicles were clearly a hot topic. There was also much discussion about the next round of international climate agreements (post-Kyoto).

VP: OK, now for the really important question: How did you like being interviewed by Jon Stewart on The Daily Show?

DS:  It was awesome—greatly aided by his visit backstage before the show to calm me down. He is so funny, quick witted, and respectful (at least of me and other non-politicians). My greatest challenge was keeping up with him (as the straight man) as he caromed all over the map with jokes and witty insights.

David Kates Interview: Alternativeenergy.com Expert & Journalist

October 21st, 2008 1 Comment

David Kates Energy Expert.

Van-Pool.com asked David Kates, Alternativeenergy.com expert and journalist, a few questions:

How did you get so involved in this topic and how did it become
your passion?

I was lucky growing up to have a number of experiences with the outdoors, particularly in the White Mountains of New Hampshire, Rocky Mountains of Colorado, and Hawaiian Islands.  As an adult, I started to see the connection between energy use and the well-being of our environment.  One of my focuses as a University of Southern California journalism student was environmental reporting on such issues as recycling in South Africa and polluted beaches from storm run-off in Los Angeles.  At AlternativeEnergy.com, I’ve been able to report on important issues like public transportation and ride sharing, which are essential components in conserving energy.

What kind of response are you getting from your listeners?

The listenership for our 15 Energy Experts Live radio shows has been steadily growing as we get the word out on green Web sites and blogs.

What has generated the most response from you listeners?

Many of our listeners and readers own renewable energy businesses.  They’ve been particularly concerned about the uncertainty of the federal renewable energy Investment Tax Credits.  (These were approved as part of the Wall Street bailout bill last week.)  Listeners also love to debate the Presidential candidates’ energy plans.

Obviously, the government can do a lot to get people to conserve energy and use renewable resources, what can the typical person to do drive measurable results and pull his/her own weight?

Some people will not conserve energy and use alternative energy sources without laws and financial incentives passed by government.  But it’s easy to forget that many individual actions can make a difference.  So don’t wait for government.  You can drive an efficient, low-emissions car; ride share and take public transportation;  put solar panels or a wind turbine on your house; buy green power from your utility; and purchase energy-conserving appliances.

What does being “green” mean to you?

Being “green” means understanding one’s place in the world and one’s impact on it.  All of us have an impact on the Earth whether we like it or not.  The key is to learn from prior mistakes from the Industrial Revolution and its aftermath.  We know how to live sustainably, and we have the technology to do so.  We just need the commitment.

Are you optimistic about the future?

Reporting for AlternativeEnergy.com, I can’t help but be optimistic about the future.  Organizations are inventing and improving upon clean sources of energy every day.  And the people in the sustainability field have incredible passion for what they do.  They believe that they’re doing their small part to save the world.  This is a very invigorating concept.

What does the future look like to you? What have we always done recently that will seem totally foreign to future generations?

The other day, I was standing on the sidewalk next to a major road in Los Angeles watching the traffic pass by.  I thought, “What are we doing burning long-dead dinosaurs?”  Not long after, I was thinking the same thing as I inhaled diesel fumes from a truck.  We could be so much more progressive with our energy choices.

There are intermediate steps.  I drive a compressed natural gas Honda Civic.  Natural gas is still a fossil fuel, but it contains less carbon than regular gas or diesel.  There are a number of vans, trucks and buses today running on natural gas.

But electricity generated from clean sources is the ultimate transportation fuel, according to most of the energy experts I speak with.  There are no tailpipe emissions.  We just need to work on dependable, longer range batteries and a convenient charging/battery replacement infrastructure.  Biofuels and hydrogen will contribute to our fuel mix, as well.

We have found that many commuters are initially attracted to vanpooling and carpooling because of cost savings, but later find that the social and environmental benefits outweigh the cost savings? Does that surprise you?

It’s clear to me that being green saves green.  I think this will become more true as the renewable energy industry strengthens as the customer base increases.  Prices for alternative energy and efficient technology will come down.  Most people vote with their wallets.  If it saves them money, they’ll do it.  And I think traditional energy sources will continue to get more expensive, especially as cap and trade schemes become the norm.  Greener technology will make sense for utilities, corporations and their customers.  The social and environmental benefits of this transition are tremendous.

Any last words for our van-pools.com readership?

Congratulations!  Ride sharers are ahead of the curve.  This industry will be growing leaps and bounds for some time.

Herb Wood Accepts Award at ACT Conference

September 23rd, 2008 1 Comment

Herb Woods at ACT Conference

ACT is the Association for Commuter Transportation.  ACT supports individual mobility management professionals and organizational members in their efforts to reduce traffic congestion, conserve energy and improve air quality.

Herb Wood was awarded the President’s Award  at the recent conference.

Go Green! In Town, Conference Will Address Transportation

August 11th, 2008 0 Comments

Hundreds of experts in transportation demand management will gather in Atlanta for their annual conference later this month, providing a unique opportunity for local business leaders and HR managers to learn strategies to help them and their employees cope with record gasoline prices.

The conference takes place in Atlanta, GA- August 24-27.  Register Today

Kim Coble, Executive Director for Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Speaks Out!

August 11th, 2008 0 Comments

We recently interviewed Kim Coble, who is the Executive Director for the Chesapeake Bay Foundation on her views of sustainable transportation. The Chesapeake Bay Foundation is a non-profit environmental advocacy organization with the sole mission of restoring and protecting the Chesapeake Bay. Read more on Kim’s thoughts and answers to our questions:

1. Does anyone in your organization belong to a vanpool or carpool to work because of the recent gas prices?

Yes, several staff have formed their own carpools due to the recent gas prices but a number of staff have been in carpools for awhile due to the environmental benefits of car pooling.  Additionally, CBF staff use alternative methods to get to work including, biking, boating and kayaking. We also have a number of staff with hybrid vehicles and provide a special parking stop for those with hybrids!

2.  What makes the “Green Building” ( Merrill Center)  the “greenest” building on earth?  Is there anything specific that makes the building different than other “Green” Buildings?

The Merrill Center was the first Platinum LEED certified building in the world.  We are pleased to say that since we moved in in 2000, there are about 50 other Platinum certified buildings.  The Merrill center is a unique building in that, it sits on the shores of the Chesapeake Bay, functions as an office building and a conference center and is very green.  Some environmental highlights of the building include, composting toilets, geo-thermal wells, collecting and reusing all the water from our roofs, sustainable building materials and maximizing the use of the sun. The Center uses 10 % of the water and 40% of the electricity that a normal building this size would use.

3. What are your views on sustainable transportation and efforts we can do as a whole to cut down on carbon emissions?

I believe sustainable transportation is critical to our environmental future. The United States has created and subsidized a very unsustainable transportation system and this needs to change.  The high gas prices have really helped to push us in the right direction and it is encouraging to hear so much discussion about transportation choices.What can we do – as individuals there are the obvious choices regarding the type of vehicles we drive, how fast we drive, and how much we drive.These are very important choices however, I also believe that we must get our businesses and corporations to make different choices.  This is where a company such as VPSI plays an important role.  Business leaders need to create incentives for their employees to drive less.  There area number of actions that can be taken and I believe a lot of room for some creative thinking to encourage employees to drive less with regards to their commute.

4. What are your main objectives at the Chesapeake Bay Foundation?

CBF is a non-profit environmental advocacy organization with the sole mission of restoring and protecting the Chesapeake Bay.  We have been around for about 40 years, have offices in Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia and in Washington DC.  We work at the state and federal levels on policies that will help restore and protect the Bay.  Additionally,we have a nationally recognized education department that each yeartakes over 40,000 students, teachers and decision makers out on the Bay and on the rivers and streams.  The idea behind this program is to get folks outside and teach them about the Bay and its watershed.  If someone experiences our natural resources, they will learn to love them and if they love them, they will take better care of them.

5. Was the Merrill Center built from donations?

The Merrill Center was built with donations, the largest from Phil and Eleanor Merrill whom the building was named after. We also sold two of our downtown offices and obtained funding for placing the property inconservation easement.

6. How does the vehicle exhaust in the Baltimore area  contribute to the destruction of the Chesapeake Bay?

There are two primary ways vehicle exhaust harms the bay and onesecondary way. The two primary ways is that cars emit a pollutant called nitrous oxide. Believing that what goes up must come down, the nitrousoxides are emitted from the cars, go into the air and ultimately land or the water or on the land and are washed into the water. In short,nitrous oxides are a form of nitrogen, which is the leading pollutant to the Bay.  Currently there is a tremendous amount of effort and resources going to reducing nitrogen loadings to the Bay.  Our goal is to cap the nitrogen loads at 170 million pounds per year.  Currently we are at about 320 million pounds per year across the entire watershed. Obviously, we need to do everything we can to reduce the nitrogen loads,including driving less and driving LEV vehicles.  (As an aside, the population in the Bay watershed is at about 15 million and projected to grow to about 19 million in the next 20 years.  This will mean more carson the road and really creates a sense of urgency to transition ourselves to cleaner and fewer cars.)  The other primary way vehicles impact the Bay is that they emit greenhouse gases in general and contribute to global warming.  The Bay is very shallow and therefore, very susceptible to sea level rise. The secondary concern related to cars has to do with sprawl development.  One way to drive less is tolive closer to where you work.  If we keep converting land and developing in a sprawling fashion, we will continue to have long, polluting commutes.  The way we develop our land is directly related tohow much impact cars have on our environment.

7. Can you tell us a bit about your background and passion for the Chesapeake Bay Foundation?

My academic background is in toxicology and worked for a number of yearson projects related to the interface between human health and the environment.  Fifteen years ago, I started with CBF as a scientist. Ididn’t have much ecological background however, the foundation recognized that protecting human health and protecting the environment are very linked. Five years ago, I became the Maryland ExecutiveDirector for CBF and oversee our policy work in Maryland. Thank you for acknowledging my passion because I am definitely passionate about mywork and the opportunity we all have to improve the environment.

8. What is the CBF doing to combat increasing surface runoff from major urban (Washington, DC and Baltimore) and agricultural areas that cause pollution of the Chesapeake Bay?

CBF has been working in all three states as well as, at the federal level to obtain funds to assist our local governments and farmers in implementing environmental practices.  Over the last, 8 years we have obtained over $3 billion.  This money will go a long way in helping get practices and programs in place that will help reduce runoff. We also work very hard to ensure the state regulatory programs are aggressive and targeted.  Most recently in Maryland, we have been working with the Maryland Department of the Environment on the Montgomery County Storm water permit and the state wide stormwater regulations to ensure these regulatory programs will result in less runoff getting into our rivers and the Bay.

9. Does CBF support raising states’ gas taxes to further encourage fuel conservation and investment in and the use of sustainable transportation?

I can not say we have a blanket support of increasing the state’s gas taxes because how they are constructed and what they are used for varies by state. However, conceptually, we do support programs that will discourage driving and encourage investments in sustainable transportation.  We have been looking at ways to encourage the state toreduce its VMT (vehicle miles traveled).

10. What is CBF’s position on off-shore drilling off the coast of Virginia and Maryland?  What alternative sustainable energy sources does CBF support?

We are opposed to off-shore drilling off the coast of VA and MD. Instead of drilling off our sensitive shorelines, we believe it is time to embrace real energy solutions – energy efficiency, renewable resources like solar and wind power, and improved miles per gallon. We don’t need to sacrifice our shorelines and coastal waters, national treasures like the Chesapeake Bay, and our local economies to meet America’s energy needs.